Posted by
SD45 on Saturday, August 02, 2008 1:24:41 PM
If residents have to tighten their home budgets without a raise, why shouldn't school districts? Crystal resident Candace Oathout asked this in her letter to the editor at the
Sun Post:
I have been following the debate on District 281 operating levies for a
little more than two years now. During that time, I've learned more
about my neighborhood and the folks who live in it.
Our
neighborhood is comprised of long-term retired residents living on
fixed incomes interspersed with first-time homeowners who took
advantage of past easy credit to finally become homeowners. These folks
are solid middle-class citizens who are doing the best they can to get
by.
The rhetoric of the last levy campaign included a reference to "the
cost of a latte a day," indicating folks were sacrificing children's
education for selfish luxury. Let me put a different perspective on
this claim, one that is just as valid today. The current figures put
forth are $12 to $15.41 a month on a home valued at $245,000.
Twelve
dollars a month equals three of the cheapest medications a month; fuel
for about three trips to a local large grocery store at $4 a gallon for
gas; four days of heating or cooling at current rates (costs are
projected to increase 40 percent to 50 percent this winter).
Add to this an average of one to three homes per block in some stage of foreclosure.
Surely
anyone with basic common sense sees that the message from taxpayers to
the district last time around will be echoed in a new referendum.
It is past time for belt-tightening in the district, as well as in neighborhoods.